social justice

Guest column: Understanding law enforcement, part two: The intricacies of moving forward

A Collaborative Essay written by: William Berry Jr., Shawn I. Butler and Brian Schenck Special to The Citizen, published on Sunday, June 27, 2021 in The Citizen, “Lake Life” section.

From left, Auburn Police Department Chief Shawn Butler, Harriet Tubman Center for Justice & Peace Chair William E. Berry Jr. and Cayuga County Sheriff Brian Schenck. (Photo Provided)

From left, Auburn Police Department Chief Shawn Butler, Harriet Tubman Center for Justice & Peace Chair William E. Berry Jr. and Cayuga County Sheriff Brian Schenck. (Photo Provided)


There are ongoing efforts to remediate what is inherently problematic within the law enforcement profession as to actions pertaining to race, gender, cultural or gender identification. As law enforcement leaders, social justice advocates and allies work to change inappropriate or bias-related policing, it is incumbent on the larger society to refrain from using a broad brushstroke to paint all police as one nefarious self-serving cohort or an insidious, recalcitrant cabal bent on blindly protecting all officers, regardless of unlawful infractions, from accountability under the law.

During the past several years, the media has centered on incidents regarding white officers’ use of deadly force where the victim tends to be Black, and that imagery has captured the thinking of the national citizenry. These painful scenarios are not lost on the policing profession or social justice advocates. While 17th century enslavement, racism and oppression morphed into subsequent generational legally sanctioned and societal acceptance of inappropriate police actions that are unfortunately grounded in race-based control, dehumanization and subjugation, there remains an ongoing dilemma. Do historical (and “contemporary”) sins of the past indelibly mark current policing in its totality? Undeniably, there are more officers who have built careers with respect for citizens and the tenets of their profession. However, the “bad seeds” tend to cast an overarching aura of bad policing on the entirety of officers when that mantle of inappropriate and often deadly behavior is not warranted by most of those honorable members of the profession. Social activists and society in general must grapple with this dilemma that is becoming more complex and problematic with every reported national incident.

A pervasive trait in the 21st century is the fact that racism, implicit biases and societal political actions portend that one race is intrinsically and inherently superior to another race even when challenged by most faith-based leaders. Even with such denunciations of white supremacist thinking, there remains an ongoing societal problem and paradox in the American character. Subsequently, the task faced by law enforcement is how to best eradicate past injurious practices with a more comprehensive sensitivity to and understanding of race and its decades-old grip on the American psyche, as well as the public’s impatience with strategies developed to change what has been decades in the making toward a singular, quick fix. Recent documentation of white supremacists joining police departments have complicated this issue and, for some, raise first amendment rights and sensibilities.

Often, biased media reports, pointed political rants from both sides of the political aisle, and too-early pronouncements of supposed guilt or the righteousness of appropriate police action are unfairly articulated before independent investigations are completed. The totality of these factors tend to further complicate the public’s understanding of all facets of any police issue, especially those actions where there is the use of deadly force. It may be prudent if initial analyses are not vocalized by the involved police jurisdiction, but timely and transparent reports to the public and media by the sanctioned investigating body. And in that vein, lawyers, pundits and media talking heads should also delay their comments and wait for the end of any investigation. This measured approach should not broach any independent analyses or opinions as long as commentary is stated clearly as not a providence of fact.

The contemporary issues facing all phases of law enforcement are intricate patterns within the colorful and diverse fabric of human dignity and self-worth. And in that complexity of human endeavor, we should see social justice activists, police and allies on either side of any policing action or public safety discussion as respectful contributors to be heard and listened to. While it is possible for all involved citizenry to be on the same side regardless of pre-stated stances, there should be a commonality of thought to approach and settle adversarial differences. Engaging in difficult conversations and finding workable resolutions can, and often does, appease both sides. And that process begins with a willingness to communicate with one another in an attempt to understand different perspectives based on lived experiences, be it professional or cultural.

Any national discussion of police actions that prompt public concern, planned marches, impromptu demonstrations and, in some cases, adjudication in court, have a measurable impact on local policing and action. While national situations have an impact on the thinking of local communities, Auburn and Cayuga County residents should assess local police and the sheriff's department on what is actually done and not what people assume those departments do. While these overarching issues are complex, our local focus must remain centered on the needs of our community, and those ongoing efforts and initiatives continue to move toward a model of community-based policing. It is critical to know about and understand the intricacies of local law enforcement and how officers operate within the realm of public safety. With such perspectives in place, more members of the community can assist in furthering effective law enforcement.


William (bill) E. Berry Jr. chairs the board of the Harriet Tubman Center for Justice & Peace, serves as a board member of the United Way of Cayuga County, and publishes aaduna, an online literary and visual arts journal based in Auburn. Shawn I. Butler serves as chief of police for the Auburn Police Department, is president of the Central New York Association of Chiefs of Police, and is the Northeast regional chair of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, Midsize Agencies Division. Brian Schenck serves as the Cayuga County Sheriff.

An essay written by: William Berry Jr., Shawn I. Butler and Brian Schenck Special to The Citizen Newspaper, published on Sunday, June 20, 2021

 

Our view: Keep building on the 'Auburn Cayuga Approach'

The Citizen Newspaper Editorial Board, published September 3, 2020

Auburn Police Department Sgt. Christine Gilfus and Jack Hardy of the Harriet Tubman Center for Justice and Peace talk at a "getting to know you" event hosted Aug. 28 by center. (Photo Credit: Lisa Brennan, HTCJP Secretary)

Auburn Police Department Sgt. Christine Gilfus and Jack Hardy of the Harriet Tubman Center for Justice and Peace talk at a "getting to know you" event hosted Aug. 28 by center. (Photo Credit: Lisa Brennan, HTCJP Secretary)

All around the nation over the past few months, millions of people have marched and demonstrated in support of the Black Lives Matter movement. Not long after those demonstrations began, another public demonstration began — marches and rallies in support of law enforcement.

Many of these events are being framed, if not by organizers then by many participants, as being diametrically opposed to each other. There's an implication that you can't possibly stand up to say "Black Lives Matter" if you also feel compelled to "Back the Blue."

And that's a huge part of why tensions remain so high all over the United States. There has been far too little work aimed at building understanding of each other as people, and searching for common ground upon which to establish a foundation for fundamental social justice reforms.

Fortunately for people in Auburn and Cayuga County, we've seen the exact opposite approach. While people standing up for social justice issues and law enforcement still have much work to do, leaders have been coming together with a true purpose.

LOCAL NEWS

Auburn law enforcement, social justice leaders connect at event

An excellent example of a small but deeply meaningful effort took place last week when law enforcement and social justice leaders got together for a "speed dating" type of event in Auburn in which everyone spent time talking to each other about their lives. It wasn't a debate on what's going in city hall, Albany or Washington. It was just a chance to get to know others as people.

Bill Berry Jr., event host and chair of the Harriet Tubman Center for Justice and Peace, explained the purpose well in a post on the center's website:

"Build community where different opinions could be heard, valued, and respected; where everyone recognizes that compromise is a stance to achieve in order to reach an agreed upon end game of true partnership and cooperation."

This philosophy, part of what the Tubman Center calls the "Auburn Cayuga Approach," takes a lot of hard work to put into action. And we all should be proud and grateful to have community leaders willing to do that work.

But it also takes the rest of the community to achieve meaningful and lasting progress. To that end, Berry and the Tubman Center are encouraging everyone to consider organizing similar "getting to know you" type of events.

We'd love to see these happen all over the city and county, and perhaps it can be an inspiration beyond our borders for other communities to start moving past divisions so they can start righting some long-standing wrongs.

The Citizen editorial board includes publisher Michelle Bowers, executive editor Jeremy Boyer and managing editor Mike Dowd.

Citizen Newspaper 09 03 2020.jpg

Auburn law enforcement, social justice leaders connect at event

David Wilcox, Features Editor, The Citizen Newspaper, published

September 3, 2020

 

Letter: History shows we can make social justice progress

“My View,” Gilda Brower, Letter to the Editor, The Citizen Newspaper, published August 21, 2020

Gilda Brower, HTCJP Vice-Chair & Founding Member, speaks at the Harriet Tubman Center for Justice & Peace, Inc. sponsored Town Hall Community Meeting held on June 27, 2020 at the NYS Equal Rights Heritage Center in Auburn, NY (Photo credit: …

Gilda Brower, HTCJP Vice-Chair & Founding Member, speaks at the Harriet Tubman Center for Justice & Peace, Inc. sponsored Town Hall Community Meeting held on June 27, 2020 at the NYS Equal Rights Heritage Center in Auburn, NY (Photo credit: Lisa Brennan, HTCJP Board Secretary)

I trust each one of us can agree that societal changes have happened during our lives and our grandparents’ lives. Cars, televisions, computers, as well as world wars and the atom bomb, which was dropped on Hiroshima when I was  1 month old, are dynamic situations that prompted profound changes in human society. What is “normal” today was not normal at all in my grandmother’s day, or during most of my life. Consider the following facts to understand the “universality” of social justice changes that benefit every one of us today.

1. In 1900, when my grandmother was born, 80% of the world population was serf, peasant or slave and did not have the right to vote or legal protection.

2. Though voting rights were expanding throughout the world at that time, to a large extent only white men who owned land could vote. Most men and women were “owned” by their traditions, such as “share crop,” in which peasants, serfs and former slaves gave a portion of their crops to the “lords” who owned the land.

3. Peasants, serfs and slaves did not have legal “rights” to life and liberty.

4. It was legal to own humans for more than 40 centuries. Bias, such as white supremacy, inferiority of women and dehumanizing blacks and all nonwhites, was legal, and existed for centuries and throughout my own grandmother’s life (1900–1953).

5. Women were “purchased” for marriage and their person and their belongings became the legal possessions of their husbands.

6. Every kind of bias was legal, even unjust and abusive behaviors were condoned. Domestic violence was legal and condoned! Child abuse and sexual exploitation was condoned. “Victims” were ostracized and punished by the “system” which blamed the victims.

7. The 13th Amendment “freeing” all citizens of the United States was passed just 30 years before my grandmother was born.

8. “Civil Rights” legislation was passed in 1963, when I was in college, which allowed education and jobs to be available to blacks, women and other minorities.

9. Before “Civil Rights” legislation it was legal to deny education and jobs to women and people of color. Housing and jobs could legally be denied on the basis of race and sex. After "Civil Rights" legislation, jobs, housing and education started the long road of seeking equality for all; however, there continued to be obstacles, both covert and overt.

10. Prior to 1963 and throughout my life up to that time, it was legal to deny housing, deny jobs and physically abuse minorities, wives and children. (Remember the old saying, “spare the rod, spoil the child”?) It was legal to hang a sign saying, “Blacks need not apply” (for jobs or housing).

11. Since 1963, the long hard road of pushing against long-established norms and biases has been challenged legally. We now, thanks to civil rights legislation, openly address domestic violence, which is no longer condoned. We now openly address child abuse, and priests are no longer allowed to sexually abuse children, which was quietly condoned and overlooked all over the world. Workplace sexual harassment is no longer condoned, as evidenced by celebrities who have lost their “privilege” and their careers due to sexual harassment of employees. African-Americans and women are now able to study medicine and law. Blacks are more able to live wherever they would like, rather than finding absolute restrictions confining them to one (often rundown) neighborhood.

Therefore, we all agree that ...

12. There are many good reasons why we all feel biases for our political parties, sports teams and churches. Most of our biases are helpful and good. Only biases removing personal safety and liberty of others are both unconstitutional and, thankfully now, unlawful.

13. Every citizen, Republican, Democrat, woman, man, Baptist, Catholic, Jewish, or Muslim, are benefiting from equal opportunity, freedom from sexual harassment and freedom from violence (domestic and institutional).

14. Violence, which law enforcement addresses every day, is the product of neglect, mental illness, poverty, systemic racism and ignorance. We are all united in our commitment to address violence and the victims trapped in abusive and toxic lives.

15. It now feels normal to have African Americans and women become doctors, lawyers and successful businessmen and women, and for diverse candidates and politicians to routinely seek the votes of women and minorities. None of that was normal in my grandmother’s day. The vote was given to women when she was 20 years old. And in my lifetime prejudice and legally condoned injustices did not start to be addressed until I turned 20! Not that long ago!

Auburn resident Gilda Brower is a founding member of the Harriet Tubman Center for Justice and Peace and also a member of the Auburn Human Rights Commission.

Letter to Editor Gilda Brower.jpg

“My View,” Gilda Brower, Letter to the Editor, The Citizen Newspaper, published August 21, 2020

 

Letter: Education leaders must do their part

“My View,” bill berry, jr., Letter to the Editor, The Citizen Newspaper, published August 16, 2020

bill berry, jr. speaks at the Harriet Tubman Center for Justice & Peace, Inc. sponsored Town Hall Community Meeting held on June 27, 2020 at the NYS Equal Rights Heritage Center in Auburn, NY (Photo credit: Lisa Brennan, HTCJP Board Secretary)

bill berry, jr. speaks at the Harriet Tubman Center for Justice & Peace, Inc. sponsored Town Hall Community Meeting held on June 27, 2020 at the NYS Equal Rights Heritage Center in Auburn, NY (Photo credit: Lisa Brennan, HTCJP Board Secretary)

The community continues to move forward with pertinent conversations and actions with local law enforcement to enhance equity and better understanding between the two cohorts. Based on the recent presentation and transparency driven by statistical information to social justice organizations by the Auburn Police Department and a pending mid-September presentation from the Cayuga County Sheriff’s Office, it is time for social justice organizations to challenge the diversity intentions of those institutions that educate our young people.

The Auburn Enlarged City School District and Cayuga Community College’s executive leadership have been absent in articulating or discussing how their institutions are manifesting administrative/executive leadership that recruits, appoints, recognizes and values leaders of color. Now this observation may be misplaced. However, the community has not been advised of such written and measurable institutional plans. Those leaders and their boards are now on notice and challenged to provide to the community their written plans to diversify their administrative and teaching ranks to better prepare students for a diverse and multicultural world of employment and societal participation.

Law enforcement has the appropriate hurdle of a civil service exam, and multiple subsequent tests that extend over a year to finally identify candidates who are qualified to be hired. As social justice organizations work with Auburn police and the county sheriff’s office, our proactive vision must not overlook those institutions that play a major and significant involvement in the life of our children. And if the institutional leaders of our children’s education are not capable of making diversity a real initiative, I suspect the elected and appointed boards need to take on that task. At that point, board members’ responsibility is to guide and task educational leaders with their vision to conscientiously move forward the overall best interests of the community, as well as hold those leaders accountable for inactivity, lack of vision, or failure to comprehend the tenors of the times and the mood of this community.

William Berry Jr.

Auburn

William Berry Jr. is chair of the Harriet Tubman Center for Justice and Peace and publisher of aaduna.

 

Letter: Free speech means sometimes disagreeing

“My View,” Dr. Lucien Lombardo, Letter to the Editor, The Citizen Newspaper, published August 14, 2020

Dr. Lucien Lombardo speaks at the Harriet Tubman Center for Justice & Peace, Inc. sponsored Town Hall Community Meeting held on June 27, 2020 at the NYS Equal Rights Heritage Center in Auburn, NY (Photo credit: Lisa Brennan, HTCJP Board Secretar…

Dr. Lucien Lombardo speaks at the Harriet Tubman Center for Justice & Peace, Inc. sponsored Town Hall Community Meeting held on June 27, 2020 at the NYS Equal Rights Heritage Center in Auburn, NY (Photo credit: Lisa Brennan, HTCJP Board Secretary)

In a letter published July 30, 2020, Andrew Dennison asks: “Where was my free-speech last month?” Legislator Dennison should look in the June 26 edition of the newspaper. His free speech rights were recognized and his views about racism were published for all to read.

Once his First Amendment rights were respected, Mr. Dennison must have understood that people would react to his words. Given his position as a county legislator (or as a private citizen) this must be why he wrote. We believe what rankled Mr. Dennison was that those who responded to his words (many whose voices were not heard in the past because they did not look like Mr. Dennison, i.e., people who experience lives as Black people) were able to make their voices heard in the legislative meeting and in the newspaper.

Many who responded to Mr. Dennison’s words in a critical way did look like Mr. Dennison (were white) but these Mr. Dennison dismisses as "left-leaning,"  "Democrats" (not people like him).

In essence, people (whether Black or white) speaking up against what they perceive as "racist" statements (rather than tacitly accepting them) is the problem Mr. Dennison is really addressing — not First Amendment rights.

Mr. Dennison should recognize by now that voices of people who do not look like him will be speaking their truths whether he likes it or not! Their voices will matter! He can listen and learn, just as those who disagree with him should listen to and learn from him. They did this when the Cayuga County Legislature (or "Democrats" as Mr. Dennison says) “pushed a diversity resolution” in July of 2019.

The First Amendment says, “Congress shall Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Mr. Dennison’s right to free speech was not restricted in any way. In fact, Mr. Dennison seeks to restrict free speech by his veiled threats to sue The Citizen and two prominent people of color in the community, whom he singles out by name (even though a wide range of people, Black and white, spoke out against his previous letter).

Listening to and learning from diverse voices and experiences can make us uncomfortable and make life more complicated, but it is what makes our community fairer and more just for all.

Lucien Lombardo

Auburn

Lucien Lombardo is a board member and past chair of Harriet Tubman Center for Justice and Peace.

 

Together We Move Forward

117567857_3890146464335845_6656020898223060470_o.jpg

On Monday, August 10th in Auburn Memorial City Hall Council’s chambers, the Auburn Police Department executive team provided a formal presentation to the leadership of Auburn’s social justice organizations. Led by Chief Shawn Butler, this gathering sought to enhance understanding as to APD’s policies, protocols, operational procedures, and other issues that the leadership of social justice organizations need to know especially as these organizations move forward initiatives to create a more inclusive, respectful community in partnership with law enforcement.

In collaboration with the Auburn/Cayuga branch of the NAACP and the City of Auburn’s Human Rights Commission, the Harriet Tubman Center for Justice and Peace worked with and helped to facilitate the Auburn Police Department’s presentation.  

These photographs follow the agenda and order of presentations by APD officers.

(Photo credit for all images: bill berry, jr.) 

Please click the play button below to view the LIVE STREAM

https://www.auburnny.gov/home/news/auburn-police-department-community-forum-policing-our-community-august-10-2020

Picture1.jpg